Drink related violence is creating no-go areas in England's towns and cities according to the Independent. But that has not persuaded Gordon Brown of the merits of minimum pricing, as favoured by his own health minister Andy Burnham, as well as The Royal College of Physicians and just about every other body of medical opinion. Interesting that Burnham, who presumably consulted widely on the issue, was opposed in Cabinet by the Scottish Secretary Jim Murphy and the chancellor Alistair Darling as well as Brown. Now what do these three have in common again? Ah yes, they all occupy Scottish seats. The health of their own constituents is a matter for the Scottish Parliament, where the opposition, including Labour, has vowed to block attempts by the SNP government to introduce minimum pricing. If Westminster backed the policy - as its own cross party health committee has already recommended - that would obviously embarrass the Labour Party in Scotland. It would expose Iain Gray's poor judgement and cynicism - two of his own ex-health ministers, Susan Deacon and Malcolm Chisholm publicly backed the SNP proposal. .
I wonder how the English people identified in The Independent as being scared to walk through their neighbourhood because of aggressive drunks feel about this? A policy that would reduce liver disease, cut violent crime and save the NHS a fortune has been ditched because the SNP thought of it first. It's a sort of West Lothian question in miniature, in this case a whisky minature. The cabinet Scots, hailing from a country which drinks 25% more than the rest of the UK, are determined to poison Britain's not-quite-so-inebriated nations as as well. I'd be outraged if I lived in Tunbridge Wells...
Labour does have one health-related justification for its stance - it is terribly allergic to the nationalists and has been very poorly since May 2007 when it was deprived of what it believed was its divine right to rule Scotland. Allowing Alex Salmond any kind of positive legacy would be fatal to its chances of securing power at Holyrood again.
For more on the background, read my recent column Iain Gray is harming himself and others
This sounds like the usual 'moral panic in the media' type nonsense.
Anyway, try this for a hangover cure.
At c.19 minutes the News Quiz team discuss Buckfast. It's a hoot, but so is the rest of the programme.
Enjoy -
The News Quiz
BBC Radio 4
22/23 Jan 2010
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00pxvr7
all the best GLG.
Posted by: joe90 kane | January 23, 2010 at 08:40 PM
Hmmm. Spare us your sympathy. If the UK government had followed the SNP route and introduced a minimum price in England, someone would have used exactly the same headline on the basis that the English poor were having to pay higher prices to discourage Scottish drinking habits.
Not that I would in any way wish to discourage the SNP with its plans for Scotland. There will be fortunes to be made from Calais type booze warehouses just south of the border.
Posted by: Salmondnet | January 23, 2010 at 09:36 AM
I lived in England for many years and recall the alarm raised in slumbersome Maidenhead when the town centre was declared “a no-go area” on Friday and Saturday nights, at the same time I was reading in the Scottish press that Scottish provincial towns like Kelso were experiencing the same blight.
That was in 1988! So governments have been very slow to learn.
Posted by: Graeme Murdoch | January 20, 2010 at 08:53 AM
Called social engineering the NuLabour way, helps to get there future voters in the right frame of mind.
Posted by: cynicalHighlander | January 19, 2010 at 11:48 PM
Yes good piece agree 100%
Posted by: Bill Duff | January 19, 2010 at 11:33 PM